Archive for July, 2008
Lucky number?
Posted by Jim in Stuff Jim Wonders About on July 28, 2008
Now we all just know seven is a lucky number (although it seems in China, the number is anything but). Something to do with it being the most common total you can get with a pair of dice or any other of dozens of quite plausible though likely not the real deal answers. Myself, I’m a 13 guy.. turned 13 on Friday the 13th. But seven .. hmmm.. doesn’t do much for me. But hey, everyone’s mileage can vary, eh?
So.. what of this thing called the Seven Year Itch … if seven is so lucky, how did it get mixed up with a violation of the bonds of marriage? Turns out, the origin is not about something that happens “after” seven years at, but rather an itchy skin condition that “lasted seven years”. Since the mid 1800s, at least in the US, the treatment of said condition is trivial, but the moniker lives on … funny things we do with words!
Aren’t they the same guys?
Posted by Jim in Stuff Jim Wonders About on July 27, 2008
Well, except one.
Last week, I had the enormous joy of presenting the core bible lesson amongst a wonderful array of activities to 80 kids and a plethora of middle and high school age volunteers are our annual Vacation Bible School. During the final day’s lesson on Pentecost, it occurred to me that there was question that I’d wondered about very often, but never really knew the answer.
Monday through Thursday we spent in the Gospels, calling this little band of followers “disciples”. Come Friday, suddenly we’re called these same guys “apostles”. So what gives.. are they disciples or apostles. The question occurred to be and I had to admit to myself that I didn’t actually know this very simple and fundamental thing.
One of my teen helpers can to the rescue and of course now that I had something of an answer, I had to dig a little. Turns out, the answer is as simple as the definitions of the words themselves.
So, for the three or four folks out there who don’t already know, heres the deal. Disciple is a word for “student”, while Apostle translates roughly to “one who is sent”. Duh .. sometimes the things I don’t know really make me wonder!! For those who number themselves among the body of Christianity, disciple before the Ascension, apostle after. Couldn’t be simpler. And I don’t even think I had to kick something out of my brain to make room for that!!
What’s with the cheap mirrors?
Posted by Jim in Stuff Jim Wonders About on July 14, 2008
Every once in a while you find something out that makes you feel really stupid and makes you wonder how many stupid things have rolled off your tongue to make a point that was way off base.
“Objects in mirror are closer than they appear”
We’ve all seen it. Some may even have remembered that somewhere along the way in driver’s ed, they probably told us about it. Well, not when I went through. I’m certain of it. And that ‘48 Farmall tractor once which I learned to drive didn’t have any rear view mirrors anyway!
I always wondered why the passenger side got stuck with with I presumed had to be a low budget mirror. Would it have killed them to pony up for a real one? Turns out, there’s actually a really good reason for the disparity in mirrors (at least on vehicles in the US…). The driver’s side mirror is nearly flat, sometimes perhaps very slightly concave, making the image seen be very close in distance to the actual distance were one to face the other direction (full body turns not generally a good idea for the driver though.. try this with the engine off!).
On the other side, were automakers to put an equivalent mirror there, we wouldn’t be able to see much of anything. Bad angle, long distance. So instead, so that we at least distinguish shapes, we have a convex mirror on the opposite side. Upside, we can see something. Downside, distance is a little distorted. Don’t believe it? Look into the back of a spoon .. sure enough, you look much farther away than you are.
I stand corrected and apologize for every time I’ve uttered some ridiculous criticism of automobile designers. You guys and gals certainly got this one right and we ought thank you for it!
Expired isn’t always a bad thing .. or is it?
Posted by Jim in Obsessions on July 13, 2008
Okay, you’ve got me here. I’m guilty of a heinous crime against conservation of things in the fridge and I really don’t have a rational reason for it. We all have things that really send us off the deep end that other people can just ignore. I have three really big ones (and ask my wife .. probably a couple million little ones), one involved driving (particularly cell phone related things!), another regarding the conduct of young people (whole ‘nuther story!), but a more benign one is today’s topic.
Can I drink the milk in the fridge is it is past the printed expiration date? Well, my personal answer is absolutely not. I can’t explain it. I’m downright freaky about dairy products (other than butter…) and the need to 1) keep them COLD, and 2) honor thy expiration date.
Can the milk carton sit on the table while kid number whatever has a bowl of cereal. Gives me the willies but it probably ain’t gonna hurt anything. Should it sit there while all my kids wander in and have said bowl of cereal over a two hour period. Even hardy souls should probably quiver at that!
But what about the expiration date? For me, it is sacred. But that’s just me. I practice just in time inventory management with the milk. Would the “experts” say this is necessary. Well.. probably not. No one is gonna fault me for playing it safe – particularly since we never waste it, but most would tell you (and this is commonly practiced in the food service industry…) that you’re in good shape a good solid seven days past that expiration date if the container has been opened as long as it is kept cold, perhaps ten if unopened.
By the way .. I don’t drink milk in restaurants…
Insignificance as a virtue…
Posted by Jim in Hobbies, Obsessions on July 11, 2008
As part of a world wide group of folks who share an appreciation for the ways of days gone by, I’m party to a good number of conversations that don’t really matter much (and least not outside our circle…). Today I present only a burning question …. no answer. Why? Well, because somehow, somewhere, perhaps there really is someone who can legitimately answer the longest standing head scratcher in the old tools community – why did handsaws have nibs? (I hope he or she is reading!)
Look closely at the top of the saw in the left side of the image .. that little gadget sticking up is affectionately called a “nib”. Well, today it started again. Hey, it’s Friday… time for a diversion right? On the OldTools list, someone brought it up. Happens every couple months. After a half dozen posts, someone even made a comment saying he needed to get it in before the conversation degenerated in humor. Which of course it did. No one seems to really know why saws had nibs. Some claim some useful purposes .. some of which are reasonably believable .. some not.
The conclusion most (but certainly not members of the “Saw Nib Mysterious Function Society”) can live with is that it originated back in the day where craftsman took pride in their tools as much as they did their work and it served none other than a decorative function. I guess I can live with that … not so sure I’m sold on what really happened in Dallas in 1963 though!
